Skip to content

Conversation

@arbaobao
Copy link
Contributor

@arbaobao arbaobao commented Jul 22, 2025

Tracking issue

Why are the changes needed?

If we specified the project/domain in the flytectl config, flytekit will create to corresponding project/domain

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

If a task configuration is defined in the Flytectl config, it should be used; otherwise, the default settings will be applied.

How was this patch tested?

Add task configuration in flytectl config and create a workflow. It will be create at the specified field.

Setup process

Screenshots

Screenshot 2025-07-23 at 12 47 09 AM Screenshot 2025-07-23 at 1 07 25 AM Screenshot 2025-07-23 at 1 07 39 AM

Check all the applicable boxes

  • I updated the documentation accordingly.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

Summary by Bito

This pull request enhances task configuration management by integrating user-defined project and domain settings from Flytectl. It improves parameter handling and default value application, streamlining the setup process and correcting documentation discrepancies.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.95238% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.49%. Comparing base (eb5a67f) to head (6ebcb96).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
flytekit/remote/remote.py 0.00% 2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (eb5a67f) and HEAD (6ebcb96). Click for more details.

HEAD has 60 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (eb5a67f) HEAD (6ebcb96)
62 2
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3302      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.92%   76.49%   -6.44%     
==========================================
  Files         348      218     -130     
  Lines       28294    22764    -5530     
  Branches     2969     2971       +2     
==========================================
- Hits        23463    17413    -6050     
- Misses       3983     4532     +549     
+ Partials      848      819      -29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@arbaobao arbaobao force-pushed the Add_user_specified_field branch from 9c52f5e to 429a47e Compare August 15, 2025 16:18
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nelson Chen <[email protected]>
@pingsutw pingsutw merged commit edd0f41 into flyteorg:master Aug 21, 2025
115 checks passed
Atharva1723 pushed a commit to Atharva1723/flytekit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants